The BEMER 3000 -
A Comparison with the Curatron (B3K)
Have you done a search
lately on the internet for BEMER 3000? You will notice that a
company in Israel called Curatron, or B3K, have an advert asking you to compare how
much 'stronger' their cheap device is compared to the BEMER. Sure the
BEMER 3000 is more expensive, but we do expect to pay more for
quality and safety. So lets compare apples with apples...
So, in my
personal capacity, and in the interest of accuracy I feel compelled
to dispel the delight that Curatron take in assuming your ignorance
of scientific matters.
Feigning a comparison of
their product with BEMER 3000, here are some of the statements they
make, and my response:
1.
“Our devices are more powerful”
A favorite comparison is
to show how much more ‘powerful’ Curatron and other units are, measured
in Gauss. They state that the incredibly low emission of the Bemer
means that it will have no therapeutic effect, it simply can’t work.
Not understanding the special signal Dr Kafka designed at the time
was a serious mistake they made, and so they lost out on the
opportunity to use it. The signal has been DESIGNED to be of
the lowest emission with the maximum frequency spread. What that
means, is that for a much lower energy emission, all
cells are energized at the same time, not just a few.
For example, most devices with strong sinusoidal signals reach only
a few different cellular frequencies. (The Curatron (B3K) is even further behind other
competitors)
All Devices that emit a
higher Gauss may be responsible for EMF Pollution, which is why the
Curatron is contra-indicated for pregnancy, pacemakers, and other
implants.
The Bemer reaches all cell frequencies 33 times every second,
and the BEMER 3000
has no contra-indications because it does not need a high
intensity to cover its incredibly wide frequency range. So the BEMER
is able to accomplish a much better spread of therapeutic action
without negative side-effects. It supports the body, not causing it
stress or subjecting it to unnecessary
‘magnetic radiation’. More…
2.
“Serious PEMF studies in the public domain are based on sinusoidal
signals”
The fact that most serious
and independent double blind PEMF studies in the public domain are
based on sinusoidal signals is simply because nothing else was
available at the time. Fortunately technology improves, mostly
anyway, and here BEMER 3000 are on the cutting edge. Since the BEMER
patented signal was developed, the world’s major universities,
teaching hospitals, the largest Heart Clinics (i.e. the Heart
Institute of Berlin) and two International Health organizations,
namely the International Society of Disease Prevention and the
International Association of Geriatrics have enthusiastically
embraced the new technology.
3.
“Your Research was self-funded”
Well, quite simply, we’re
proud of that! We put our money where our mouth is, and we were
happy to use our profits in this way.
We had to show the world
this ‘low’ energy device actually worked! So we turned to reputable
research organizations to aid us in this quest. The findings
surprised them, and us! Yes, the clinical evidence has been beyond
our original expectations! It was not long before the most
prestigious research facilities starting doing independent double
blind studies of the BEMER 3000 and our most important results have
arisen from these independent studies – namely the findings
of the increase in blood microcirculation, liver function, immune
system improvement, and the study of the regulation of protein
synthesis.
(Studies available on request.)
4.
“Your researchers had a financial interest”
Sorry Curatron and B3K, all
researchers have a financial interest in some way don’t they? We
do trust them though, to do their best, and we trust their peers
to review the findings and conclusions they reach before it is
published. That is the system used throughout the world.
Something really
interesting though: Most researchers become avid Bemer users. In
fact, most of them want to become part of the Bemer family to make a
contribution to Bemer in some way. For example, Sports Medicine
Scientist, Horst Michaelis of the Academy of Bioenergetics, started
researching Bemer applications. Result? He enthusiastically wrote
the Bemer User manual, and is still an integral part of the Bemer
family 10 years later.
Dr Bohn in private
practice noticed startling changes in his patients who were using
the BEMER. Today, he heads our International Medical Affairs
coordinating supporting the huge amount of interest in Bemer 3000
research on several continents.
Next, Prof Dr Ralph Klopp
of the prestigious Microcirculation institute in Berlin was
commissioned by the International Society of Geriatrics to find
non-invasive non-drug alternatives to assist geriatrics with chronic
conditions, reducing their use of medications. Dr Klopp examined 12
different therapies, but found that none compared with the results
obtained with BEMER 3000. In fact, Dr Klopp was compelled to say
that “the Bemer has changed forever the science of blood
microcirculation”
Since then, he has gone on
to help improve the Bemer signal (Yes, even the best can
be made better!) with our first change in 10 years – the result?
The Bemer Plus signal. Not a ‘stronger’ signal – just
smarter, which leaves our ‘competitors' even further behind…
So why does everyone who
uses the Bemer want to contribute in some way? Think about it.
It changed my life. It
could change yours.
Luiz Teixeira
| 
